9/10 Kin selection


Meerkats: how we used radar to reveal the underground maze they call home

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Ftheconversation.com%2Fmeerkats-how-we-used-radar-to-reveal-the-underground-maze-they-call-home-90878&psig=AOvVaw13AJ8jAB_n2sBa-727PFae&ust=1600315087520000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CA0QjhxqFwoTCMCUhbfk7OsCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAD

This week's lectures discussed altruism in the context of natural selection. Dr. Wiggins asked if we believed that kin selection is altruism. I do not believe that kin selection should be considered altruism. Altruism is defined as a behavior that increases the fitness of the recipient but decreases the fitness of the donor. Kin selection involves a donor favoring their kin. Because kin selection increases the genes of the donor as well as the recipient it should not be considered altruism. If the donor genes were not increased it could be considered altruism. However, in the case of kin selection the donor benefits as well going against the definition altruism.

Comments

  1. How do you then deal with the further extrapolation of that notion? Isn't all of life technically kin? We all descended from the same organic soup after all. Does that mean altruism doesn't exist in your mind? Please don't take this as me accusing you of anything, I'm just curious as to your thoughts on the matter.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment